MEMORANDUM
TO:                         All County 
Assessors, Auditors and Councilors
FROM:  
                Micah G. Vincent, Commissioner
RE:                          Reassessment 
Fund Guidance
DATE:                    September 6, 
2013
On June 19, 
2013, the Department of Local Government Finance (“Department”) disseminated 
guidance on legislative changes to the reassessment fund levy and the closing of 
the 2012 General Reassessment Fund (see http://www.in.gov/dlgf/files/130620_-_Vincent_Memo_-_Reassessment_Fund_Levies_and_the_Closing_of_the_2012_Reassessment_Fund.pdf 
). Additional questions have been raised as counties prepare their 2014 budgets. 
This memorandum addresses these questions and outlines the appeal process that 
is available for county assessors.
Due to the 
removal of the Department’s certification of the property tax levy in the 
reassessment fund, counties have questioned whether or not the reassessment fund 
is still required to have a levy or if the reassessment duties can be included 
in the county’s general fund. Per IC 6-1.1-4-27.5(a) (see below), a county is 
required to have a reassessment fund.  IC 6-1.1-4-27.5(b) also requires a levy 
for the estimated costs of the reassessment. While not specifically stated, the 
Department believes that the intent of IC 6-1.1-4-27.5 is to have a property tax 
levy in the reassessment fund in order to provide specific funding for the 
statutorily required reassessment tasks. Grouping the reassessment levy into the 
general fund eliminates the ability to specifically identify the required levy 
for reassessment as the general fund levy will have many uses. In spite of this, 
the intent of the reassessment fund changes in HEA 1116-2013 was to provide more 
local control in setting and managing the reassessment fund levy. If the 
decision is made locally that the reassessment fund levy would be included in 
the general fund and all local stakeholders are agreeable to this plan, the 
Department will not require a reassessment fund levy for 2014. Great deference 
will be provided to the local decision-making process.
The Department 
recognizes that there may be situations in which all local stakeholders do not 
agree with the county council’s decisions on the reassessment fund levy. These 
situations could include the situation described above in terms of the including 
the reassessment fund levy in the general fund or they could include situations 
in which the county assessor believes the levy provided to the reassessment fund 
will be insufficient to provide for the county’s reassessment responsibilities. 
In these situations, IC 6-1.1-4-27.5(c) and (d) provide for an appeal process.  
Initially, the county assessor may petition to the county council to increase 
the reassessment levy. The assessor must document the need for increased 
funding.  If the county council denies this petition, the county assessor may 
appeal to the Department. The Department will hear the appeal and will determine 
if additional levy is necessary.
In making a decision as to whether or not 
additional reassessment levy is necessary, the Department will evaluate a number 
of things. First, the Department will consider the amount of reassessment levy 
currently provided by the county council and the fund in which this levy is 
being provided. The Department will then review the assessor’s assertions that 
additional levy is necessary. If the Department determines that additional 
reassessment levy is necessary, the Department will certify to the county the 
total amount of reassessment levy that must be provided. For the purposes of 
this certification, the Department will approve the reassessment levy into the 
reassessment fund.  This decision is consistent with the Department’s 
interpretation of IC 6-1.1-4-27.5 and allows for greater oversight of the 
reassessment levy in the county.
County assessors and county councils should 
remember that the reassessment fund is within the county’s maximum levy. In the 
event that the Department orders a reassessment fund levy or an increase in the 
reassessment fund levy above what the county council has approved, the levies of 
other funds may be reduced during budget review to ensure the county remains 
within its statutory maximum levy. A reassessment fund levy certification as a 
result of the outlined appeal process is not an excess levy appeal and does not 
increase the county’s maximum levy.
IC 6-1.1-4-27.5
Property reassessment fund; tax levies; 
petition to increase levy; appeal
Sec. 27.5. (a) The auditor of each county shall 
establish a property reassessment fund. The county treasurer shall deposit all 
collections resulting from the property taxes that the county levies for the county's property reassessment fund.
(b) With respect to a reassessment of real 
property under a county's reassessment plan under section 4.2 of this chapter, 
the county council of each county shall, for property taxes due each year, levy 
against all the taxable property in the county an amount equal to the estimated 
costs of the reassessment under section 28.5 of this chapter for the group of 
parcels to be reassessed in that year.
(c) The county assessor may petition the county 
fiscal body to increase the levy under subsection (b) to pay for the costs 
of:
                (1) a reassessment of one (1) or 
more groups of parcels under a county's reassessment plan prepared under section 
4.2 of this chapter;
                (2) verification under 50 IAC 
21-3-2 of sales disclosure forms forwarded to the county assessor under IC 
6-1.1-5.5-3; or
                (3) processing annual 
adjustments under section 4.5 of this chapter. The assessor must document the 
needs and reasons for the increased funding.
(d) If the county fiscal body denies a petition 
under subsection (c), the county assessor may appeal to the department of local 
government finance. The department of local government finance shall:
                (1) hear the appeal; and
                (2) determine whether the 
additional levy is necessary.
As added by P.L.198-2001, SEC.18. Amended by 
P.L.90-2002, SEC.42; P.L.151-2002, SEC.1 and P.L.178-2002, SEC.7; P.L.245-2003, 
SEC.5; P.L.228-2005, SEC.9; P.L.219-2007, SEC.13; P.L.146-2008, SEC.78; 
P.L.172-2011, SEC.27; P.L.112-2012, SEC.17; P.L.218-2013, SEC.1.
If you have 
any questions on the information outlined above, please contact Assessment 
Division Director Barry Wood at (317) 232-3762 or bwood@dlgf.in.gov, or Budget Division 
Director Courtney Schaafsma at (317) 234-3937 or cschaafsma@dlgf.in.gov.