MEMORANDUM
TO: All Political
Subdivisions
FROM: Brian E. Bailey,
Commissioner
RE: Demonstrating Need in Excess Levy
Appeals
DATE: June 22, 2012
DEMONSTRATING NEED IN EXCESS
LEVY APPEALS
Introduction
This memorandum
informs civil taxing units (meaning every taxing unit except school
corporations) of the criteria the Department of Local Government Finance
(“Department”) uses to determine whether a civil taxing unit (“unit”) is
eligible for an excessive maximum levy appeal (“appeal”). Indiana Code
6-1.1-18.5-12 permits a unit to appeal to the Department for relief from its
levy limitations after the unit has determined that it cannot carry out its
governmental functions for the ensuing calendar year. The Department must
examine and determine the merits of the unit’s claim.
Appeals are fact
sensitive inquiries. Indiana Code 6-1.1-18.5-12(a)(2) requires a unit to
support its claim for an appeal with reasonably detailed statements of fact. In
evaluating the merit of an appeal, the Department takes a “need-based” approach
based on the information presented and the prescriptions of the Code. However,
the Department generally will not approve an appeal if doing so gives the unit a
fund balance of 10% or more (in other words, the excess of cash and investments
exceed liabilities and obligations by 10% or more). If an appeal is approved,
the appeal amount is incorporated prior to certification of budgets, tax rates,
and levies for the unit.
Type of Factors Evaluated by
the Department
The Department
may consider the following factors in reviewing an appeal:
(1) What
is the percent increase of the rate due to the appeal?
(2) What is the percent increase of the levy due to the
appeal?(3) What is the appeal impact per capita?
(4) Is the taxing unit affected by circuit breaker credits?
(5) Will the appeal create a circuit breaker credit?
(6) Has the unit experienced levy excess in the recent years?
(7)What is the taxing unit’s history of excessive levy appeals?
(8) Is the unit located in a TIF district?
(9) Does the unit have a balance in its rainy day fund and if so, how much?
(10) Does the unit plan to transfer surpluses in the current year to its rainy day fund and if so, how much?
(11) What is the unit’s fund balance as a percent of its budget?
(12) What will be the effect on the unit if the appeal is denied?
(13) If the appeal is a correction of an error, what is the error?
(14) If the appeal is an emergency appeal, what is the emergency?
(15) If the appeal is due to an annexation, consolidation, or extension of services, how many additional persons will the unit serve?
a. What is the expected increase in assessed value?
b. What will be the impact of the income and excise tax distribution?
(16) If the appeal is due to an annexation, does the amount of the appeal reflect the fiscal plan as originally submitted and would the percent increase in maximum levy mirror the percent increase in assessed value?
(17) Was there opposition or objection to the appeal?
(18) What was the vote by the fiscal body in approving the appeal?
(19) Was the appeal advertised with the ensuing year’s budget advertisement?
(20) Is the appeal a permanent or temporary increase to the maximum levy?
Note: appeals
are not allowed to recover losses due to circuit breaker credits. When a unit
reaches a circuit breaker threshold, increasing property tax rates and levies
will only reduce revenues to other governmental units.
Types of
Appeals
Indiana Code
6-1.1-18.5 permits the Department to provide relief for the following types of
claims:
(1)
Annexation, consolidation, or
extension of services.
(2)
Three-year growth factor
exceeding 2% of the state-wide average.
(3)
Correction of advertising
errors, mathematical errors, or errors in data.
(4)
Shortfall due to erroneous
assessed valuation.
(5)
Emergency.
Annexation, Consolidation, or Extensions of
Services
Indiana Code
6-1.1-18.5-13(a)(1) allows a unit to seek an increase in its maximum levy to pay
additional costs for providing services to newly annexed or consolidated areas
or for extending governmental services to additional geographic areas or
persons. In other words, this appeal is intended to assist cities and towns in
accommodating growth in land area.
The Department
evaluates the merits of an annexation, consolidation, or extension of services
appeal based on the nature of the area being annexed. Specifically, the
Department looks at both the costs associated with providing police and fire
services to the annexed area and when such services are established in the
area. The Department treats annexation appeals in a manner similar to how it
handles reorganizations of political subdivisions under IC 36-1.5, the
Government Modernization Act.
In evaluating
the costs the unit alleges it will incur due to the annexation, consolidation,
or extension of services, the Department pays particular attention to the
proportionality of the unit’s proposed percent increase in maximum levy to the
percent increase in the unit’s assessed value following the annexation,
consolidation, or extension of services. In other words, if a unit’s assessed
value increases by 20% due to an annexation, the Department would expect to see
the unit’s maximum levy increase by no more than approximately 20%. Implicit in
the statutory provision that the Department determine whether a maximum levy increase is “reasonably
necessary due to increased costs of the civil taxing unit resulting from
annexation, consolidation, or other extensions of governmental services” is
the notion that an increase in a unit’s maximum levy should rationally mirror
the expenses incurred through the annexation, consolidation, or extension of
services, and that the expenses are sensible and credible. An appeal requesting
a 40% increase in a unit’s maximum levy when the unit’s assessed value increased
by only 20% due to an annexation would be a cause for concern. To justify an
increase in maximum levy, a unit must demonstrate that the area it is annexing
or into which it is extending services will actually be receiving new benefits
and services it was not previously receiving.
Note, an
annexing unit is entitled to either an automatic increase in its maximum levy of
up to 15% pursuant to IC 6-1.1-18.5-13(a) (Version b) or an appeal awarded by
the Department, but not both. If a unit increases its assessed value through
annexation by more than 15%, the unit would potentially qualify for an increase
in its maximum levy through an appeal that is greater than would be the
automatic adjustment of up to only 15% provided by IC 6-1.1-18.5-13(a) (Version
b).
A unit seeking
an annexation, consolidation, or extension of services appeal must submit the
following information to the Department for review:
(1)
The time frame of annexations
to be considered.
(2)
Any levy increases granted
for each budget year within the time frame of annexations.
(3)
The types of services that
will be needed and/or increased due to annexation.
(4)
The increased expenses due to
annexation for each year.
(5)
The appeal amount requested,
determined by the following:
a.
The total amount of the
appeal, supported by evidence of increased expenses, less the levy increases
granted in the years of annexation; divided by
b.
The total number of years of
annexation.
(6)
Whether the total amount
requested matches the amount in the fiscal plans for each annexation.
(7)
Whether the unit transferred
funds to its rainy day fund during the budget year or the immediately preceding
budget year and:
a.
if it did, the amount and the
fund from which the transfer was made; or
b.
if it did not, whether the
unit plans to transfer funds to the rainy day fund in the near future. If the
unit plans to transfer funds, what is the anticipated amount?
Three-Year
Growth
Indiana Code
6-1.1-18.5-13(a)(3) permits a unit to appeal if its average assessed value
growth quotient (“AVGQ”) over the last three years exceeds the statewide AVGQ by
at least 2%. The amount, if any, of an appeal for which a unit may be eligible
is determined by the following formula:
Step 1: Determine the unit’s certified assessed valuation for the last
four years.
Step 2: Calculate the assessed value growth for each of the
last three years.Step 3: Calculate the AVGQ by taking the sum of the results of Step 2 and dividing by three.
Step 4: Determine the statewide certified assessed value for the last four years.
Step 5: Calculate the assessed value growth for each of the last three years.
Step 6: Calculate the statewide AVGQ by taking the sum of the results of Step 5 and dividing by three.
Step 7: Divide the Step 3 amount by the Step 5 amount.
For a unit to
qualify for the appeal, the Step 7 amount must be equal to or greater than
1.02. The percentage by which an appealing unit’s maximum levy is increased
will likely mirror the percentage by which the unit’s growth exceeds statewide
growth.
Correction
of Advertising Errors, Mathematical Errors, or Errors in
Data
Through a
Correction of Error Appeal pursuant to IC 6-1.1-18.5-14, the Department may order a correction of any advertising error,
mathematical error, or error in data made at the local level for any calendar
year if the Department finds that the error affects the determination of the
unit’s maximum levy, tax rates, or tax levies. The unit must state what type of
error occurred and the amount of the error that should be considered by the
Department. The unit should provide documentation showing that a specific error
actually occurred. Requests for consideration of errors that may occur
will not be considered.
Most critically,
because this appeal contemplates errors involving advertising or mathematical
calculations, the Department will not consider appeals seeking to correct a
unit’s past policy decisions. In other words, if in a year a unit
voluntarily reduces its maximum levy but subsequently regrets this decision,
this is not an error as meant by IC 6-1.1-18.5-14 and thus would not qualify for
a Correction of Error Appeal.
Shortfall
Due to Erroneous Assessed Value
Under IC
6-1.1-18.5-16, a unit may seek an appeal due to a shortfall of property taxes
resulting from erroneous assessed value or refunds for successful assessment
appeals. This appeal is available only when the shortfall affects funds that
fall within the maximum levy. This is a temporary appeal, meaning that an
approved increase in maximum levy is effective for one year only.
The unit must do
the following for consideration by the Department:
(1)
State which budget year(s)
experienced a shortfall.
(2)
Describe in detail what
caused the error(s) in assessed value and the dollar amount associated with the
error(s).
(3)
List the unit’s district
numbers, per the auditor’s reports, and calculate the sum of the
following:
a.
Total District Net Amount
from the 127-CER Report.
b.
Total District Net Amount
from the 17-TC Report.
c.
Total District Net Errors and
Refunds Issued.
(4)
Subtract the actual
distribution and the circuit breaker from the certified levy of each fund
(excluding debt and cumulative funds).
(5)
If the unit received a levy
excess in the past three years, state the taxing year(s) and
amount(s).
(6)
Whether the unit transferred
funds to its rainy day fund during the budget year or the immediately preceding
budget year and:
a.
if it did, provide the amount
and the fund from which the transfer was made; or
b.
if it did not, whether the
unit plans to transfer funds to the rainy day fund in the near future. If the
unit plans to transfer funds, what is the anticipated amount?
(7)
Whether the unit has a fund
balance of 10% or more of its annual budget before the transfer to its rainy day
fund. If yes, give the percent of the fund balance.
The unit must state with specificity the cause of
the shortfall and provide the following:
(a) County Form 127CER (Register of
Certificates of Error) for the year(s) in which the shortfall occurred for
each taxing district of which the unit is a taxing entity;
(b) County Form 17TC (Certificate of
County Auditor of Tax Refund Claims) for each taxing district of which the
unit is a taxing entity. Refunds must clearly indicate the
assessment year for which the refund is claimed; and(c) County Form 22 (County Auditor’s Certificate of Tax Distribution) for each year the unit is claiming a property tax shortfall.
Failure to
provide the necessary documents may result in denial of the appeal.
Emergency
Levy Appeal
Pursuant to IC
6-1.1-18.5-13(a)(13), a unit may seek an increase in its maximum levy if it
cannot carry out its governmental functions for an ensuing year due to a natural
disaster, accident, or other unanticipated emergency. A unit must
describe the underlying emergency giving rise to the appeal. The Department does
not consider a generally poor local or national economy to be an unforeseen
emergency. This is a temporary appeal.
A township may
submit an appeal resulting from an unanticipated emergency that increases
the amount of township assistance requests. In evaluating township requests,
the Department evaluates the following criteria:
(1)
Did the township identify a
specific, unforeseen emergency to which it is responding?
(2)
Did the township show that
more applicants have applied and more relief has been given in the current year
than in past years? The township should use TA-7 data from the past ten years
and include copies of the forms from these years with the
application.
(3)
Did the township demonstrate
that the township assistance budget, all useable cash balances, and other
township assets have been exhausted? The township must provide financial
information as evidence.
(4)
Were a significant portion of
the total disbursements from the township assistance fund for direct
assistance? The Department will compare the direct assistance provided to the
total disbursements to ensure that the administrative overhead was
reasonable.
(5)
Any other factors the
Department deems relevant.
Again, pervasive
unemployment or poverty resulting from a generally weak local or national
economy will not be treated as an emergency. A unit will have to point to a
specific occurrence, such as a tornado, flood, or the sudden closure of the
unit’s sole or primary private employer to qualify for an Emergency
Appeal.
School
Transportation Appeal
Although a
school transportation fund-related appeal is not a traditional maximum levy
appeal governed by IC 6-1.1-18.5, it is addressed in this memorandum because it
does involve an increase to a school’s transportation fund maximum
levy.
A school
corporation may appeal to the Department to increase the maximum levy permitted
for its transportation fund under IC 20-46-4. To be granted an increase, the
school corporation must establish that the increase is necessary because of a
transportation operating cost increase of at least 10% over the preceding year
as a result of at least one of the following:
(1) A fuel
expense increase.
(2) A significant increase in the number of students enrolled in the school corporation that need transportation or a significant increase in the mileage traveled by the school corporation’s buses compared with the previous year.
(3) A significant increase in the number of students enrolled in special education who need transportation or a significant increase in the mileage traveled by the school corporation’s buses due to students enrolled in special education as compared with the previous year.
(4)
Increased transportation operating costs due to compliance with a court-ordered
desegregation plan.(2) A significant increase in the number of students enrolled in the school corporation that need transportation or a significant increase in the mileage traveled by the school corporation’s buses compared with the previous year.
(3) A significant increase in the number of students enrolled in special education who need transportation or a significant increase in the mileage traveled by the school corporation’s buses due to students enrolled in special education as compared with the previous year.
(5) The closure of a school building within the school corporation that results in a significant increase in the distances that students must be transported to attend another school building.
In addition,
before the Department may grant a transportation maximum levy increase, the
school corporation must establish that it will be unable to provide
transportation services without an increase. The Department may grant an
increase that is less than the increase requested by the school
corporation.
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Questions may be
directed to Staff Attorney David Marusarz at (317) 233-6770 or by e-mail at
dmarusarz@dlgf.in.gov.
http://www.in.gov/dlgf/files/120622_-_Bailey_Memo_-_Excess_Levy_Appeals.pdf
http://www.in.gov/dlgf/files/120622_-_Bailey_Memo_-_Excess_Levy_Appeals.pdf
