Monday, January 7, 2013

Revenue Denies Carryforward Claim; Upholds Penalties and Interest


Taxpayer is an Indiana corporation doing business in Indiana. On April 16, 2012, Taxpayer filed its 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 Indiana Corporate Adjusted Gross Income tax returns. On the 2007 return, Taxpayer reported an overpayment of tax which Taxpayer then carried forward as successive payments on its 2008, 2009, and 2010 returns.

The Department denied Taxpayer the opportunity to carry forward its 2007 overpayment to the 2008 through 2010 returns because Taxpayer filed the 2007 return after the deadline for claiming refund/carryforward had expired. The 2007 return was due on April 15, 2008. Taxpayer filed the 2007 return on April 16, 2012, a full year after the 3-year statute of limitation to claim refund/carryforward had expired. IC § 6-8.1-9-1 governs the deadline for requesting refund or carryforward of a tax overpayment. IC § 6-8.1-9-1(a) states:

If a person has paid more tax than the person determines is legally due for a particular taxable period, the person may file a claim for a refund with the department. Except as provided in subsections (f), (g), and (h), in order to obtain the refund, the person must file the claim with the department within three (3) years after the latter of the following:
(1) The due date of the return.
(2) The date of payment.
For purposes of this section, the due date for a return filed for the state gross retail or use tax, the gasoline tax, the special fuel tax, the motor carrier fuel tax, the oil inspection fee, or the petroleum severance tax is the end of the calendar year which contains the taxable period for which the return is filed. The claim must set forth the amount of the refund to which the person is entitled and the reasons that the person is entitled to the refund. (Emphasis added).

Taxpayer explains that it was late in filing its returns because of problems with the accounting firm it had initially contracted with to file its returns in which the current owners bought the company in 2000. Taxpayer states it had difficulty tracking down the original documents it had turned over to this accounting firm. Taxpayer explains that it then hired a second accounting firm, in 2009, to clean up the mess created by the first accounting firm and to file its federal and state returns.

Irrespective of the reason why the returns were filed late, the 3-year statute of limitations to claim refund/carryforward of an overpayment of tax had run out. Taxpayer's 2007 Corporate Income Tax return was due on April 15, 2008, but was not filed until April 16, 2012, one full year after the 3-year statute of limitations had expired.

The Department correctly denied the carryforward of the 2007 overpayment to the subsequent tax years, 2008, 2009, and 2010.

Because the Department denied Taxpayer's carryforward from the 2007 return Taxpayer's application of the carryforward was invalidated and tax became due for the years 2008, 2009, and 2010. The Department billed Taxpayer for the taxes due for those years, as well as penalties and interest.

Regarding interest, under IC § 6-8.1-10-1(e) interest cannot be waived.

Penalty waiver, however, is permitted if the taxpayer shows that the failure to pay the full amount of the tax was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. IC § 6-8.1-10-2.1(d).

Taxpayer protested the assessment of penalties again explaining that the late filing of its returns was connected to the problems it had with the accountants it had originally hired to handle their tax returns as explained above. While the circumstances relating to the professionals Taxpayer hired to file its tax returns are unfortunate, Taxpayer's problems were not limited to the first accounting firm Taxpayer hired. The second firm Taxpayer hired also missed the statute of limitations for claiming the refund/carryforward of the 2007 overpayment.

Given the problems Taxpayer had with the first accounting firm it hired to handle its taxes, Taxpayer was on notice that it needed to attend to its filing obligations more rigorously. Taxpayer has not provided sufficient explanation to show that it had reasonable cause in the late filing of its returns.