Friday, June 15, 2012

Revenue Finds Agricultural Use of Tractor Exempt but Finds Scraper Used for no Exempt Purpose

Taxpayer protests the imposition of use tax on the rental and subsequent purchase of a tractor and a scraper. Initially, Taxpayer rented the tractor and scraper, but later purchased the two items from the rental company. Taxpayer protests that the tractor and the scraper were used in an exempt manner. During the administrative hearing, the Hearing Officer explained that the agricultural exemption applied to tangible personal property directly used in the direct production of a crop or livestock.


At hearing, Taxpayer explained that he owns both the excavating business and a farm, and that the tractor and scraper were used on the farm for installing drainage ditches. Also, the tractor was used to till fields for crops on the farm. Since Taxpayer is the excavating business and since the farm is a distinct and separate entity, the use of the tractor and scraper to install drainage ditches on the farm constituted taxable uses. However, the tilling of fields for crops on the farm constituted use by the farm as opposed to use by the excavating company. Therefore, Taxpayer as a retail merchant should have collected sales tax from the farm on the rental of the tractor by the farm, as provided by IC § 6-2.5-2-1(b).


After the administrative hearing, Taxpayer provided documentation and analysis in support of its claim that the tractor was used in both exempt and taxable circumstances in the tax year at issue. The tractor was used to till land for crops on the farm and to create drainage ditches. The tractor was used a total of approximately 250 hours in 2010. 225 hours of use were for tilling ground, which qualifies as an exempt activity. 25 hours of use were for creating drainage on the farm. This results in an exempt use ninety (90) percent of the time and a taxable use ten (10) percent of the time. Therefore, the Department will recalculate the amount of use tax due by applying the use tax rate to ten percent of the purchase price of the tractor.

Regarding the scraper, it is not used in an exempt manner at all. It literally scrapes surface material for removal or relocation from its original site. This does not qualify for the agricultural exemption since it is not directly used in the direct production of a crop or livestock, as required by IC § 6-2.5-5-1 and IC § 6-2.5-5-2.

In conclusion, Taxpayer was not required to charge sales tax on the rental of the tractor to the farm, since that use qualified for the agricultural exemptions found at IC § 6-2.5-5-1 and IC § 6-2.5-5-2. Taxpayer's ten percent (by hours of usage) use of the tractor for installation of drainage ditches was a taxable use, and use tax is properly due on ten percent of the purchase price of the tractor. Use tax is properly due on the total purchase price of the scraper, since it was not used in an exempt manner at all.