Monday, March 19, 2012

Revenue Finds RV Purchased in Florida by a Montana LLC whose Sole Member is an Indiana Farming Business Subject to Use Tax

Taxpayer purchased a recreational vehicle from a Florida dealership. No sales tax was paid to Florida at the time of the transaction. Taxpayer arranged for a Montana attorney to establish an LLC to hold title to the vehicle.  The only member of the LLC is Taxpayer's Indiana farming business. Taxpayer is the president of the Indiana farming business.


The Department does not deny that the LLC may have been formed for a purpose other than avoiding the tax. However, in determining that Taxpayer was entitled to rely on the representations of the Montana attorney to the extent that Taxpayer did not knowingly commit fraud, the Department also reasonably notes the attorney's own representations that the purpose of establishing a Montana LLC is to "save a great deal of money on taxes and licensing fees...."

Unfortunately, the Department is unable to accept the proposition that Indiana residents may avoid paying sales and use tax on tangible personal property simply by titling that property outside the state. In this particular case, the Department is unable to agree that either the law, the facts presented by Taxpayer, or simple common sense compel the conclusion that Taxpayer should not be responsible for paying use tax on this vehicle.

Department has consistently determined as much. See Letter of Findings 04-20100111 (March 29, 2010) 20100526 Ind. Reg. 045100324NRA; Letter of Findings 04-20100299 (July 28, 2010) 20100929 Ind. Reg. 045100591NRA; Letter of Findings 04-20100175 (August 23, 2010) 20101027 Ind. Reg. 045100650NRA.

Along with challenging the underlying assessment of sales/use tax on the purchase of a vehicle, Taxpayer also challenges the assessment of the fraud penalty which had the effect of doubling the underlying assessment.


However unlikely the legal contortions may have been, Taxpayer apparently consulted the Montana attorney in good faith, paid that attorney to establish a Montana LLC, and believed the attorney's explanation that establishing the LLC would allow Taxpayer to avoid paying Indiana sales or use tax. As such, it is not possible to establish – by "clear and convincing evidence" – that Taxpayer possessed the requisite "degree of knowledge" or scienter sufficient to sustain the imposition of the 100 percent penalty.

SUMMARY

The assessment of the fraud penalty is not justified and should be abated. Taxpayer has not demonstrated that the purchase of the recreational vehicle is not subject to Indiana use tax.