Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Lengthy Decision Determines Exempt Status of Equipment used in Slag Processing


Taxpayer's business consists of taking slag from a steel mill, cooling the slag, and removing any iron from the slag. Taxpayer returns the steel to the steel mill. With regard to the remaining slag, Taxpayer sorts and sells the materials resulting from three slag pits for various purposes. For a fourth slag pit, the steel mill retains title to the slag and eventually sells the slag.


In Taxpayer's case, the application of water to the slag begins a process of changing the molecular structure of the slag, the end result of which is removal of certain chemicals and metals from the slag that would render the slag (absent the active process) commercially unusable. The cooling of the product is an active first step in Taxpayer's production of finished aggregate products, similar to the active step of adding ethylene to bananas in order to promote ripening in Indianapolis Fruit. The application of water to the slag–an agent that promotes and accelerates the transformation of slag from a molten liquid to a commercially-usable solid product–is the first step of Taxpayer's process. The issue is what remaining processes constitute manufacturing.

Taxpayer's process then requires Taxpayer to transport the slag to a stockpile area. In the stockpiling area, the slag is permitted to further cool and is manipulated to cool the slag, to allow chemical changes and to permit further metal removal. The stockpiled slag is loaded onto conveyors to crushing and screening equipment. The Department did not assess items used at the crushing and sorting stage.

Taxpayer has provided sufficient information to conclude that its process, up to and including crushing and screening the slag, constituted an integrated process of transforming personal property within the ordinary course of Taxpayer's business.
...

The slag is not in its final form until enough of certain basic (high pH) chemicals have been removed from the slag. Thus, under 45 IAC 2.2-5-8(d), Taxpayer's production process includes the leaching of the crushed slag. The leaching of slag is the last step in Taxpayer's production process of "air-cooled" slag.

Taxpayer also has a second line of processes. Largely separate from its production of "air-cooled slag," Taxpayer processes "granulated slag." Taxpayer uses slag from one of the steel mill's slag pits for the creation and production of "granulated slag." The "granulated slag" is generally used in cement mixes.

The start of Taxpayer's process of creating "granulated slag" is the addition of water, which is not materially different than its production of the other slag. However, because of the extra water and pressure that is required to be used in order to create "granulated slag," Taxpayer must have excess water drained prior to further transport. Once the "granulated slag" is sufficiently dry, the slag is then moved to a separate stockpile for further removal of impurities. Once the "granulated slag" has achieved the proper chemical composition, the slag is delivered to the steel mill's customers. At all times until sale of the slag to the end customer, the steel mill retains title to the "granulated slag."


In this case, Taxpayer has demonstrated that its process changes the slag from a molten material to a granular solid material usable in cement and other applications. This end product is "substantially different" than the slag acquired by Taxpayer. The steel mill from whom the slag is acquired sells the "granulated slag." Thus, Taxpayer has established that it is an "industrial processor" of the steel mill's slag pursuant to IC § 6-2.5-4-2(c). Further, Taxpayer has established that the "integrated series of operations" begins when the slag is cooled with water in the steel mill's pits and ends when the slag is rendered commercially usable by the steel mill's customers.


The Bulldozer is used at an intermediate stage of the process, after the initial application of water that begins the process and stockpiling but before crushing and screening of the slag. The Bulldozer also assists in metal removal necessary to produce the final, usable product. Further, the blending and manipulation of slag assists in the crushing and sorting portions of Taxpayer's process.

Accordingly, with regard to the Bulldozer, Taxpayer has provided sufficient information that the Bulldozer is used after the point where production begins but before production ends.


Taxpayer states that the skid steer loader is "used in and around the slag separator equipment to clean buildup of material and to allow processing to carry on continuously." Taxpayer explains that the skid steer loader prevents buildup of material around Taxpayer's crushing and screening equipment. If excess materials build up, the crushing and screening equipment would break down and/or present potential safety issues.

With regard to this item, Taxpayer has not provided sufficient information to conclude that the skid steer loader is used to manipulate, change, or otherwise transport slag during the production process. In other words, the skid steer loader does not have a direct effect on the slag.


Taxpayer explains that it uses WA500 loaders and bucket scales … for multiple purposes in its operations. For one thing, the loaders are used to bale slag "after it has moved from the crushing and screening equipment." The baling of slag is done in order to prevent larger pieces of slag from settling to the bottom of piles and also to promote leaching of the slag. The baling also prevents commingling of different slag varieties. Further, the balers are used to weigh slag for customers' requirements.

With regard to the WA500 loaders, the baling serves the purpose of enhancing the leaching process. The leaching of slag is a necessary step in producing the end product. Thus, the baling process during the leaching process and prior to sale is part of Taxpayer's "integrated process which produces tangible personal property." To the extent the WA500 loaders are used in the baling process, Taxpayer uses the WA500 loaders in production and is sustained to the extent of that usage.

However, the portion of Taxpayer's use of the WA500 loaders for loading slag for sale after the slag has reached its final, marketable form is not exempt. Thus, Taxpayer's use of the WA500 loaders in the loading and weighing process is denied.


In Taxpayer's case, proper roadways are necessary for Taxpayer's production process. However, the roadways do not have an "immediate effect" on the slag. Taxpayer's grader, water truck, and water wagon serve a necessary maintenance function; however, they are not part of the "integrated process" of producing slag, and thus Taxpayer's protest is denied on these items.


With regard to the water truck and water wagon, Taxpayer also has asserted that these items qualify for exemption under IC § 6-2.5-5-30.


In this case, Taxpayer is engaged in manufacturing. Taxpayer's operations produce particulate matter which requires Taxpayer to control the release thereof under state and federal environmental regulations and standards. Taxpayer has provided information related to state enforcement of these regulations and standards for Taxpayer's operations. However, Taxpayer has not established that the water truck and water wagon are predominantly used for "the purpose of complying with any state, local, or federal environmental quality statutes, regulations, or standards." Thus, Taxpayer's protest is denied with regard to its exemption arguments under IC § 6-2.5-5-30.


Taxpayer states its purchases of pick-up trucks and yard trucks should be exempt as directly used in the direct production of slag. Taxpayer argues that it uses the trucks to carry supplies, equipment, and repair and replacement parts in order to avoid or minimize manufacturing interruptions.

With regard to these vehicles, 45 IAC 2.2-5-8(c) provides that property for which the exemption applies must "have an immediate effect on the article being produced." Notwithstanding the fact that the trucks have a vital role in ensuring Taxpayer's efficient operations, the trucks themselves do not "have an immediate effect on" the slag. As such, the trucks are not exempt from use tax under IC § 6-2.5-5-3, and thus Taxpayer's protest is denied on these items.


Taxpayer explains that it uses Mack tractors, side-dump-trailers, and a semi-tractor trailer to transport in-process "granulated slag" from the steel mill's holding bins to Taxpayer's separator facilities. These items are referenced by Taxpayer only in Taxpayer's discussion of the "granulated slag" process.

…Taxpayer has established that these items are directly used in Taxpayer's process of industrial processing. Under 45 IAC 2.2-5-10(f)(3), "Transportation equipment used to transport work in process or semi-finished material to or from storage is not subject to tax if such equipment is used to transport work-in-process or semi-finished materials within the production process." These items are used to transport slag during the production process. Thus, the items qualify as "transportation equipment used to transport work in process" within the meaning of 45 IAC 2.2-5-10(f)(3).


Taxpayer states that it purchases repair and replacement parts for its equipment. Taxpayer argues that these parts should be exempt as being used in direct production because it uses the parts on exempt equipment. Under 45 IAC 2.2-5-8 (h)(2), "Replacement parts, used to replace worn, broken, inoperative, or missing parts on exempt machinery and equipment, are exempt from tax." See also 45 IAC 2.2-5-10(h)(2). Taxpayer has not provided a specific breakdown of parts and their use on potentially exempt equipment. However, the Department finds that Taxpayer has provided sufficient information to conclude that a supplemental audit is justified. Taxpayer shall provide a listing of the parts and the equipment on which the parts are used. Taxpayer shall be permitted an exemption for each part based on the equipment's exempt use. For instance, if equipment is used ninety percent of the time for an exempt function, the replacement parts for that equipment are ninety percent exempt.