Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Revenue Upholds Audit Findings Assessing Tax on 45% of Tractor Purchase


After an audit, the Department assessed Taxpayer use tax and interest for the 2008 tax year on 45 percent of the purchase price of a John Deere 4120 compact tractor with a loader and backhoe, and a John Deere 673 farm loader. Taxpayer protested the imposition of use tax and interest on the transactions because Taxpayer believes the equipment is 100 percent exempt.
...

Upon request by the Department, Taxpayer filed a Form AGQ-100 with the Department to indicate the manner in which Taxpayer uses the equipment. Taxpayer indicated seven different uses of the equipment.

Once a month, Taxpayer uses the equipment to haul animal waste. This activity is explicitly listed above as exempt.

Every day, Taxpayer hauls feed to livestock that are to be sold for slaughter and twice a week Taxpayer grinds feed for the livestock. These activities are also exempt. Sales Tax Information Bulletin 9 (August 2008), 20080827 Ind. Reg. 045080655NRA, states that machinery, tools, and equipment used in feeding livestock for the direct production of food for sale – by a person occupationally engaged in the production of food – is exempt.

Also, Taxpayer stated that the equipment is used every day to check on livestock, once a month to check the fencing and clean the barns, and once a month to fix waterlines. These activities may be necessary to farming, but they do not meet the "double direct" test. These activities are not directly in the direct production of agricultural products.

By adding up all the days indicated by Taxpayer on the Form AGQ-100, the Department came to a total of 882 uses of the equipment a year. The uses that are exempt from tax equates to 481 exempt uses a year. These calculations show that the equipment is used in an exempt manner 55 percent of the time.

Therefore, since sales tax was not paid at the time of purchase, use tax is due on 45 percent of the purchase price. The imposition of use tax on 45 percent of the purchase price of the equipment was proper.